We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
It is also important to note that granting of seniority to your civil servant without the actual size of service pretty much violates all the service structure for a civil servant inducted in Grade seventeen by claiming such benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher quality, which is neither the intention on the regulation nor on the equity. Read more
14. From the light on the position explained earlier mentioned, it is actually concluded that a civil servant has a fundamental right to become promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be viewed as for no fault of his have and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency within the size of service or while in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary for the determination with the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but usually are not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil law jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Plainly distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion will involve a transfer to the higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, around the other hand, provides financial relief by inserting an employee inside a higher spend scale, without switching their career duties or position. It's a system designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained inside the same pay scale for a protracted time, particularly when they lack options for promotion. Upgradation is usually a policy Instrument used to reduce the hardship of extensive-term stagnation. Read more
As the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is reached, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Inside the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court would be the highest court from the United States. Reduced courts on the federal level include things like the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, as well as U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts hear cases involving matters related on the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that entail parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Each individual state has its own judicial system that contains trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Each and every state is usually referred to since the “supreme” court, Though there are a few exceptions to this rule, for example, the Big apple Court of Appeals or perhaps the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state regulation and regulations, While state courts may generally listen to cases involving federal laws.
Quite a few judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in putting the Petitioner's name about the ECL based around the criminal case are inconsistent with recognized legal principles. Therefore, this petition must be allowed Read more
Summaries offer concise insights into the legal principles governing agreements between parties, such as the formation, interpretation, and enforceability of contracts, offering a useful resource for understanding contractual rights and obligations.
Article click here 27 of your Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination for the time of appointment of service but after the appointment in addition. The disparity from the pay out scale allowances of Stenographers while in the District Judiciary is from the obvious negation with the regulation laid down via the Supreme Court in its numerous pronouncements. Read more
twelve . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to the offender along with the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to be gathered with the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
Previous 4 tax years interpreted. It's not at all from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” usually are not binding, but may very well be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance on the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.